Building a Sustainable Digital Economy in Southeast Asia

This article builds upon the Tech For Good Institute’s research produced in partnership with the National University of Singapore’s Centre for Governance and Sustainability.

By Lawrence Loh and Sabrina Soon

The Asia Tech x Singapore mega-event, held in June together with various co-located thematic events, highlighted key challenges for technology advancements, including those for a sustainable digital economy.

Indeed, the economies of Southeast Asia have experienced significant growth in recent times. This has been driven in a notable way by the developments in the digital economy which spearheaded the reshaping of key industries and creation of new market opportunities.

Digital Economy Companies (DECs), in particular, play a crucial role as creators, distributors and users of digital technology, making them influential stakeholders in the building of a sustainable digital economy that is inclusive and secure.

To better understand the dynamics of this evolving landscape, the Tech for Good Institute (TFGI), together with the Centre for Governance and Sustainability (CGS) at National University of Singapore, conducted an industry study of 439 DECs in six country markets of Southeast Asia, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam, which are often known collectively as the “SEA-6” countries. The study aims to examine how these DECs frame their impact beyond delivering economic growth.

The benefits of the digital economy indeed extend to all segments of society and contribute to the broader sustainable development of the region. For these benefits to be realised, a collaborative effort between DECs and other stakeholders, particularly regulators, is needed. This effort can be rooted along three key pillars that drive growth in the digital economy: market development, technological development, and institutional development.

Creating an Inclusive Digital Economy

Market development is essential to ensure that all segments of society can access the advantages offered by the digital economy. The TFGI-CGS study highlights that local communities are among the most frequently cited stakeholders and the issues of focus for DECs.

This underscores the importance of developing the market to adequately serve these communities and promote equal opportunities for all to participate in the digital economy. Market initiatives include prioritising digital adoption in lower-income families to ensure that everyone can benefit from the digital economy such as accessing telemedicine, online education, social connections, and maintaining competitiveness in the evolving workforce.

To bridge the digital divide, governments must invest in both digital and physical infrastructure, improve internet penetration, particularly in rural areas and among income levels and genders. Additionally, governments can provide support through skills training, digital tools, subsidies for digital devices and internet connection, and user-friendly digital services for all groups.

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are crucial for social and economic development in Southeast Asia, accounting for 67% of the region’s job creation and 20% year-on-year GDP growth. However, they face challenges in adopting digital technologies due to limited capital, lack of digital skills, and difficulties with online-to-offline facilitation.

Governments and larger DECs can support SMEs by providing external support, advice, and facilitating connections with DECs platforms. Fintech solutions also play a valuable role in bridging the digital divide for SMEs. Fintech enables enterprises to lower transaction costs, access mobile banking, and provide alternative credit risk assessment methods. Fintech DECs can harness solutions to offer SMEs a broader range of financial service products, such as micro-loans, wealth management, e-wallets, and insurance.

Fostering a Responsible Digital Economy

Advances in technology such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), chatbots, cloud computing and augmented reality (AR) have been utilised in the digital economy to tackle challenging issues such as climate change, food insecurity, resource efficiency, and diseases. However, they can also have unintended consequences if adverse environmental and social impacts are not mitigated.

The environmental cost of technology stems from resource depletion, energy usage, waste management and carbon footprint. Policymakers and DECs can mitigate by promoting renewable energy integration, using data analytics to manage emissions, and implementing collaborative platforms for waste management. In this regard, some companies have turned the climate risks into a potential market opportunity.

For instance, there are companies partnering with recycling organisations to facilitate end-of-life management for electronic devices. This collaboration allows companies to incentivise consumers to trade in their devices, offering a rate determined by the condition and internal components of the device.

A major social cost of the technology is the rise of cybersecurity and data privacy. As personal data collection increases, protecting individuals’ privacy and mitigating cybersecurity threats are paramount. The TFGI-CGS study shows that cybersecurity and data privacy is the most common issues of focus among the assessed DECs, as it impacts their financial performance, customer trusts, and competitive advantage.

Developing a system-wide digital resilience strategy is essential and requires a collaborative approach among all stakeholders to proactively manage risks and vulnerabilities. DECs should continue to implement governance, risk management, data ownership and incident management strategies to ensure secure operations.

Ensuring a Secure Digital Economy

To foster the inclusive and sustainable growth of the digital economy, it is crucial to establish a trusted regulatory landscape. The growth and evolution of DECs have outpaced that of traditional offline companies, presenting challenges for emerging legislation to keep pace with these dynamic cross-sector industries and new business models. Policymakers now face the urgent task of developing a regulatory environment that instils trust and safeguards the digital economy.

Studies have shown that a single-tech regulator is less efficient and ideal for a region like Southeast Asia due to diverse needs and priorities. A more effective approach to regulate the digital space involves enhancing the technological understanding of existing regulators.

By equipping regulators with necessary skills and knowledge about technology and its associated business models, they can effectively oversee the digital landscape.

Regional coordination can also help advocate for better practices among tech companies and encourage regulatory innovation through shared perspective and knowledge. This collaborative model can serve as an exemplary blueprint for other regions, unlocking the benefits of technology while safeguarding the population.

In essence, the development of an inclusive and sustainable digital economy in Southeast Asia requires concerted efforts across market development, technological development, and institutional development.

To ensure equal access and opportunities for local communities and SMEs, market development should focus on bridging the digital divide by investing in infrastructure, providing skills training and ensuring access to internet connection and digital devices.

There should also be an increasing focus on mitigating environmental impacts and addressing cybersecurity and data privacy concerns to ensure a responsible technological development. Policymakers should develop a trusted regulatory landscape that keeps pace with the evolving digital economy, through regional collaboration to foster innovation and best practices.

By embracing these challenges and working together, Southeast Asia can ensure that the digital economy becomes a force for positive change, benefitting all its citizens and contributing to the region’s overall sustainable development.

About the writers:
The writers are Director and Research Associate respectively of Centre for Governance and Sustainability (CGS) at NUS Business School, National University of Singapore. Beside the writers, the TFGI-CGS research team includes Ming Tan, Mohamad Matin Mohdari, Keith Detros, Hui San Seah and Regina Ng at TFGI and Minjun Huang and Verity Thoi at CGS.

This article was first published by The Business Times on June, 15 2023.

Download Agenda

Download Report

Latest Updates

Latest Updates​

Dr Ming Tan

Founding Executive Director

Dr Ming Tan is founding Executive Director for the Tech for Good Institute. She is concurrently a Senior Fellow at the Centre for Governance and Sustainability at the National University of Singapore. Her research interests lie at the intersection of technology, business and society, including sustainability and innovation.


Ming was previously Managing Director of IPOS International, part of the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, which supports Singapore’s future growth as a global innovation hub for intellectual property creation, commercialisation and management.


Prior to joining the public sector, she was Head of Stewardship of the COMO Group, a Singaporean portfolio of lifestyle companies operating in 14 countries worldwide. Her portfolio covered sustainability, brand and data privacy. She was concurrently the founding Executive Director of COMO Foundation, the private philanthropy of the owner of the COMO Group.


As a company director, she lends brand and strategic guidance to SuperNature Pte Ltd, COMO Hotels and Resorts (Asia) Pte Ltd, COMO Club Pte Ltd, and Mogems Pte Ltd. In the not-for-profit space, Ming is an Advisor to Singapore Totalisator Board and serves on the boards of Esplanade–Theatres on the Bay, Singapore’s national performing arts centre, St. Joseph’s Institution International and COMO Foundation.


As part of her commitment to holistic education and the arts, she also sits on the Advisory Panel of the Centre for the Arts of the National University of Singapore.


Ming was educated in Singapore, the United States, and England. She obtained her bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Stanford University and her doctorate from Oxford.