
By Ming Tan, Founding Executive Director, and Bas Claudio, Programme Associate at the Tech for Good Institute
Southeast Asia’s Young but Ageing Demographic
Southeast Asia (SEA) has embraced digital technologies to accelerate development. The region’s digital economy has maintained double-digit growth since 2022 and now accounts for between 6–23% of GDP. Users are mobile-first and often mobile-only, rapidly adopting tools and services from digital platforms to e-wallets to artificial intelligence. The relative youth of the region’s population is often cited as a factor for this enthusiastic adoption. Over 60% of SEA’s population is under the age of 60, and its median age of 30.2 is lower than that of China and Europe.
While Southeast Asian nations generally have young populations, all countries in the region are home to elderly individuals. Some countries are experiencing rapid demographic aging. By 2050, one in five individuals is projected to be aged over 60. Digital inclusion for seniors therefore requires immediate action to close the digital divide experienced by today’s older citizens, as well as long-term planning to ensure that ageing workforces remain integrated and productive in the face of rapid innovation.
From a Digital Economy to a Digital Society
Digitalisation in SEA has evolved from being an economic enabler to permeating community and personal life. Governments are engaging with and serving citizens more efficiently and effectively through always-on online public information and services. Communities are leveraging location-based platforms for hyper-local information and resource sharing, while digitally enabled neighbourhood coordination offers more avenues for communal living and support. Families maintain relationships across geographies through messaging apps, video calls, and shared online activities. As individuals, almost every aspect of daily life—from entertainment to domestic chores to finding love—is mediated through the digital lens. Paraphrasing political philosopher Michael Sandel’s analysis of how the market economy has transformed society, we have moved from building a digital economy to becoming a digital society.
While navigating the rapidly evolving digital ecosystem feels intuitive for many, some older adults can find the shift from predominantly offline to online interactions disorienting and exclusionary. Seniors should not only be part of our digital society but also be empowered to benefit from digital transformation safely and productively.
A Confident Digital Society is an Inclusive Digital Society
At the Tech for Good Institute, we believe that a Confident Digital Society is both an outcome and a foundation of an inclusive digital economy. Our framework for fostering such a society rests on investments in Quality Access, Meaningful Participation, Productive Potential, and Resilience. Inclusion in general, and intergenerational inclusion in particular, is not a stand-alone objective but a necessary enabler of every dimension.
Despite increased investments and infrastructure rollouts, one in five people in Southeast Asia still lack internet access, especially high-speed connections such as 5G. Reliable and quality internet and digital services are needed in underserved areas, including rural and remote communities where many older adults reside. Beyond connectivity, factors such as affordability, reliability, speed, and customer service can encourage uptake.
In the Philippines, the Department of Information and Communications Technology’s “Free Wifi for All” programme provides connectivity in geographically isolated areas and barangays, including communities with elderly residents. Telecommunications companies are key partners in this endeavour. Malaysia’s CelcomDigi “Yellow Heart” programme, for example, targets communities with subsidised devices and dedicated support lines for seniors. At the community level, shared access points with in-person support, such as Wi-Fi hubs or senior tech corners in libraries, can provide connectivity, encourage usage by addressing hesitancy, and combat social isolation.
Having access to the internet does not guarantee benefitting from it. True inclusion involves the effective use and navigation of technology to enhance daily life. Many seniors in SEA have limited digital literacy. In Thailand, nearly half of surveyed seniors possess only basic mobile skills like calling and texting. In Singapore, most older adults use devices for leisure rather than essential services such as telehealth or e-payments.
Efforts to promote participation are inherently local. Singapore’s “Senior Go Digital” programme introduces older adults to government services, QR payments, and online banking at community hubs. In the Philippines, PLDT-Smart’s “Smart Millenniors” pairs seniors with millennial volunteers for intergenerational technology coaching, building both skills and social connections. When seniors gain confidence in using digital tools, they begin to see themselves as empowered users rather than passive beneficiaries.
Literacy, however, is not enough if services are not trusted. A robust public digital ecosystem—with good data governance, personal data protection, and robust digital ID systems—builds trust. Interoperable databases and a platform approach to services can streamline the user experience for senior citizens. Governments can also encourage usability and design through universal design principles such as the Global Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Features like larger text, voice-activated controls, and simplified layouts encourage adoption by people of all ages and abilities. Global standards can be adapted for local use and made elder-friendly, as in Singapore Standard 618: Guidelines on User Interface Design for Older Adults. Governments can set benchmarks for digital inclusion by referencing such international and national standards when implementing government services, as seen in Singapore’s Digital Service Standards.
Inclusion is not just about closing gaps. As lifespans extend and entire societies age, healthy older workers are both an economic necessity and an asset. A confident digital society values the continued productive potential of its workforce, keeping pace with technological disruption. The IMF estimates that 40% of jobs globally will be affected by AI, with an even more pronounced impact in advanced economies (up to 60%).
Preserving and augmenting productive potential means preparing the workforce for likely skills obsolescence, job redefinition, and displacement—not only for low-skilled workers at risk but also for those in mid-skilled roles. In SEA, older workers are less likely to participate in training, partly due to age-related stereotypes such as being “too old to learn.”
Targeted reskilling initiatives can counter these trends. The Philippine Skills Framework maps industry-specific competencies to guide upskilling and avoid mismatches. Continual adult learning supports older workers in upgrading skills so that their valuable experience remains relevant. Lifelong career guidance can help mid-career and older workers navigate disruptions and find opportunities suited to different life stages. Tax and social security schemes can support these transitions by facilitating job-to-job mobility and accounting for different work modalities, from traditional employment to independent work. For example, Singapore’s Central Provident Fund provides guidelines for self-employed persons who are also employees, ensuring they remain in the formal economy while contributing fairly and retaining access to social protections.
In SEA, where Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (MSMEs) account for over 95% of businesses, the twin objectives of digitalising small businesses while retaining older workers go hand in hand. In Thailand, Chiang Mai University’s Multi-Generation Entrepreneur Development Education Ecosystem combines familiar tools such as the LINE app with in-person workshops, enabling senior entrepreneurs to market products both online and offline
Last but not least, an inclusive digital ecosystem supports resilience among all users in the face of fast-evolving risks and threats. Online threats such as digitally enabled scams, fraud, fake news, and identity theft impact users both financially and psychologically. The blend of online and offline techniques, coupled with mass personalisation and deepfake technologies, has led to rising rates of authorised fraudulent transactions. In Singapore, self-effected transfers accounted for 82.4% of total reported scam cases.
A multi-disciplinary, multi-sectoral, and multi-stakeholder approach is needed to tackle such threats holistically. Targeted public education campaigns can also build resilience among seniors in response to specific risks. In Indonesia, programmes like Tular Nalar teach seniors to identify fake news and protect personal data. More resilient users, in turn, contribute to a healthier and safer digital ecosystem for all.
Digital Inclusion for Innovation
A society where older adults are included and empowered is both more equitable and more competitive. Digital inclusion strengthens the workforce while providing opportunities for innovation. The emerging “age-tech” sector, for example, spans health, wellness, mobility, smart homes, assistive technologies, fintech, and lifelong learning. The global market for healthcare technologies alone, from diagnostics to AI-powered monitoring systems, is growing at a compound annual rate of over 35%.
Advancing digital inclusion for older populations requires targeted action in two interconnected areas: ensuring that today’s seniors are digitally included, and preparing the ageing workforces of tomorrow. Policy alone is not enough. Multi-stakeholder partnerships across the public, private, and civil sectors are needed to enable parallel, reinforcing efforts toward these goals. With this approach, SEA can face the potential decline of its demographic dividend while reaping the digital dividend from continued inclusion and innovation in both the economy and society.
The views and recommendations expressed in this article are solely of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views and position of the Tech for Good Institute.
